Monday, December 17, 2012

For a Fitter Santa





For Immediate Release
North Pole
December 12, 2012

Santa Claus was diagnosed today with Type II Diabetes and told to cut back on carbs and eliminate cookies and whole milk from his diet. He was also advised to walk more and ride on the sleigh less, according to an anonymous source at the North Pole Medical Center, where Santa was admitted several days ago for observation.

In a follow-up exclusive interview at Santa’s headquarters, Mrs. Claus told this reporter that Santa had been listless and putting on weight for months.  He was suffering panic attacks, having trouble sleeping and worried that he would be unable to make his annual Christmas deliveries on schedule. “He was snacking way too much and was complaining about having no energy.”

Mrs. Claus noted that the Elves had expressed concern a week earlier when Santa failed to produce a complete itinerary of stops on Christmas Eve. He left out so many of the good little children who should have been on the list, they had told her.

The reindeer, too, had complained to Mrs. Claus. Donner doubted they would be able to achieve liftoff. “Santa weighs a ton,” Donner had confided. “Even if we do get him in the air, I’m not sure we can keep him there.”  And, Rudolph added, “I’m afraid I won’t have enough energy left to light my red nose to guide the sleigh that night. It could spell disaster if the moon isn’t bright.”

“Well, when I heard all that,” Mrs. Claus said, “I simply had had enough! I told him he had to see a doctor, and putting it off until after the New Year was not an option. But the good news is that he’s now on medication and has lost 50 pounds in the last week.”

When asked at today’s press conference how he had been able to lose so much weight so quickly, Mrs. Claus told reporters that she had put him on the Reindeer’s diet, mostly raw carrots, supplemented with fresh wild salmon and green vegetables. “He’s gotten most of his energy back, corrected the itinerary and by Christmas eve should be pretty much able to squeeze down the chimneys without getting stuck.” She paused. “How embarrassing would that be?”  With that she laughed, then added: “All you parents out there, think healthy and leave Santa a raw vegetable snack on Christmas Eve. No more cookies and milk.”

Yes. It will be a Merry but hopefully more healthy Christmas after all.

David Carr, Senior North Pole Correspondent

Friday, December 14, 2012

Who Are The Real Primitives?

Technology and "Primitive" Cultures?



When one examines human cultural traits, and particularly those expressed in politics, one trait stands out from all others. That trait is cannibalism. Cannibalism! Really?

Doubting Thomas’s take a second look. Across all cultures humans devour themselves when they expand outward leaving behind desolation, much the same as does a fairy ring of mushrooms. Great civilizations that expand without direction eat themselves off the world map and have done so with few exceptions since the beginnings of recorded history. Wars started on too many fronts. Think Hitler’s Germany. Expansion so rapid it overwhelms the backbones of cohesion such as supply and communication lines. Think Rome, or more recently, the Soviet Union. Eat or be eaten; Predator or Prey. Civilizations are by nature cannibalistic, in the final stages preying upon themselves.

But what does that say about real-life cannibals? And I don’t mean the perverted soul in the movie “Eating Raoul” or the desperate starving travelers wintering at Donners Pass. I’m talking about cultures that never devour their own, which citizens of “civilized” cultures metaphorically do with self-righteous ease. I do mean primitive cultures that prey on unexpected but welcome visitors for that tasty treat of human flesh. Think Garden Spider. Who are the true primitives?

Well, last year I had the opportunity to explore that question with the head of one such jungle tribe. Did I venture into the wilderness to do so? No. I discovered and friended him on Facebook. Yes. Facebook. It seems that the social media and technical revolution have reached the Amazon dwellers, and I don’t mean those who traffic Amazon.com.

In our initial encounter, he was put off when I addressed him as Chief.

“I prefer to be called ‘Supreme Elder,’” he said, noting that he had been duly elected by his people.

Neither did he appreciate my referring to his electorate as a tribe. As we got further into the discussion, it became apparent that he was not only up with technology, but world politics as well. He had been following closely the machinations of U.S. politics and was surprisingly knowledgeable of the issues threatening humanity, particularly as it impacted on his tribe’s environment and health. It was when I broached the issue of health care that the interview took an unexpected turn.

“Our people have approved a health care policy directive that outlaws food not raised organically.”

I was stunned. Could this mean they had abandoned the practice of eating human flesh?

“Oh no, just uncontaminated flesh,” he replied.

“Uncontaminated?”

"Yes. We prefer eating what your country categorizes as the One percent. They are a true delicacy. If not available, we tolerate as low as 53 percent for the average community feasts. But eating visitors from the bottom 47 percent is considered a health hazard and subject to levy of an extra cow for health insurance premiums."

“What’s the difference?” I asked. “Human is human.”

“That is a myth promoted by your mass media like Fox news. Mass media exist to protect the one percent from the people. The evidence shows that the one percent is well-fed, raised on organic produce and protein supplemented with wild-caught game. This is a healthy diet for my people. The 47 percent, on the other hand, are contaminated with chemicals from a lifetime ingestion of cheap processed foods that nourish only the coffers of the one percent. Very toxic to the people. The exception is the visitor from the 47 percent who is under age five, but soon even that will become too contaminated.”

“But how can you distinguish which visitors are which?”

“Sometimes by the amount of currency in their wallet. The less cash the more likely they are of the one percent. Neither do the one percenters carry credit cards as all their shopping is done by 47 percent employees. We also evaluate the purity of their flesh by brand labels on their clothes and footwear. It is not difficult and the health subcommittee has issued guidelines to assist the people’s cook’s in their determination.”

“But how can you make those determinations from so deep in the Amazon?”

“Google or Amazon.com searches are a peoples’ favorite. It is not difficult. You will have to excuse me now. The peoples’ cook informs me that an honored visitor is being brought before the Council and it is nearing dinner time. But let me end by expressing to you my great fear. I fear that revolts of the 47 percent in your country will severely curtail travel of your 53 percent to my country and put an end to our One percent delicacies. Until next time.Your Facebook friend, The Supreme Elder.”

“PS: I see from your photos on Facebook that you love the spectacular water views from your most magnificent upper Manhattan Penthouse, so you would feel right at home on the peoples’ waterfront community here on the upper Amazon. We’d love you and your wife to visit here where you could achieve a greater appreciation of our cultural, culinary and technological advancements.”

Wednesday, November 24, 2010

Groping or Scanning at Airports? Let's do it right!!

What's all the hoopla about “groping” at airports? Maybe we need a different point of view, a more comprehensive strategy. For example, how about addressing some of our health care needs at the same time.  Why couldn't airport “groping” be done by professional masseuses, physical therapists, and chiropractors, body  cavity searches by proctologists? Who would need more than catastrophic health insurance? If the government's going to pay for it anyway in the name of national security, private health insurance would be double-dipping.

For less masochistic passengers who opt for a full body scan in favor of manual groping, how about offering scanning options such as diagnostic x-rays, paid for by debiting the passenger's frequent-flyer miles?  If we're going to scan someone's body at taxpayers expense, the taxpayer should get something out of it beyond being made safe from terrorism via another passenger's explosive underpants. How about diagnoses of potential diseases or life-threatening issues?  "Departing Passengers go to Line 1 for X-Ray, Line 2 for Cat Scan or Line 3 for an MRI." And while we're at it, let's bring back the foot X-Ray machines from the shoe stores of the 1950's. Goodbye shoe bomber! Jobs, jobs, jobs. Full planes. Inexpensive Health care via a Single Payer System (Dept. Homeland Security). Problems solved!

And then there's always fashion.  How about hiring tailor's to do the non-medical groping? Security would be served and affluent travelers who prefer to arrive at their destination in a stylish and unwrinkled Armani suit could have their measurements taken at the same time. Job creation? Picture clothing being custom-made in the outlawed upper deck of a Boeing 747 en route?  Free vacation packages for top-rated seamstresses?

Whither Capitalism?